![]() ![]() Your text is also much to long and riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. Here is some information on some of the wikipedia policies your are violating. RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 22:45, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Hello again, CIC7. It has to stay out until these issues are addressed. The material is inappropriate, poorly-written, and unreferenced. Have you ever heard of spell check? Joegoodfriend ( talk) 17:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC) I agree with Joegoodfriend. If you keep introducing this without fixing its many, many problems it's just going to keep getting deleted. Joegoodfriend ( talk) 01:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC) FYI, Mr. I'm sorry, but very badly written sentences like, "The plan was for the Anti-Castro Cubans the Free Cuba Committee Cubans, who, along with their CIA handlers would try almost anything, to pose as Pro-Castro Fair Play for Cuba Committee Cubans" do not belong in an encyclopedia. ![]() A single citation indicating that the whole section more or less comes from one book doesn't cut it.Ĥ. Controversial statements need citations to support them, or they don't go in the article. Major changes to the article should be discussed here on the talk page to gain consensus.ģ. Virtually every sentence violates wikipedia's policies on presenting material from a neutral point of view.Ģ. Ok, for the anonymous editor who keeps reintroducing this:ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |